Friday, 26 April 2013

What Else Can You Tell Me?

Brad Haddin
The national cricket selectors announced a squad of sixteen to begin a seven
month long quest for the Ashes, in back to back five Test series which will dominate the cricket calendar for the second half of 2013. In doing so, they have also named seven of the squad in the Australia A team which will play a three match tour in June, whilst many of the Ashes squad are engaged in the ICC Champions Trophy.

The scheduling is again made on the basis of the belief that the modern cricketer needs little time to adjust his game before playing a deeply layered and fiercely contested Test match series. Although the Australians will be in England for three months, the five Ashes Tests themselves will be crammed into just seven weeks. If Australia plays well in the ICC event, they'll contest the final on 23rd June and then have only a couple of four day games at Taunton and Worcester to steady for the Test series. The conditions and pitch for the 1st Test at Trent Bridge will bear no resemblance to the preliminaries.

Meanwhile, Australia A, captained by Brad Haddin and with at least five players who could reasonably be expecting their names on the team sheet at Nottingham, will be swanning about in Scotland, Ireland and Bristol playing one day games against next to nobodies.

These are, of course, standard tour arrangements in the modern game. First it was drop in pitches, now its drop in cricketers. Its certainly made cricket a faster and more result oriented game but its doubtful its made it a better one.

Raking the cream off the money cake, the home administrators will stage three T20s and five ODIs after the Test series.

Ho, hum indeed.

Even before James Anderson has had time to announce he'll be targeting Michael Clarke or James Pattinson the opportunity to bristle in the media with his plans to undo Alastair Cook, the English media and even those jaundiced contemporaries in Australia, have declared this the worst side ever or since. There may well be grounds for these claims among the batsmen but the bowling presents a different story.

India can't be taken as a serious form guide. Prior to the disasters there in February/March, the Australians had continued to build momentum against good opposition and dispatched poorer company. Don't believe everything you read in the paper! India can be the sternest test for a player in the longest form of international cricket. The combination of a lack of batting experience on the toughest pitches prepared in many an Indian summer against an opposition revitalised by emerging players finally being preferred over aging stars, was too much for the Australians. No international side in similar circumstances could have done better.

That's a matter of history.

Ed Cowan
What the Indian tour did show was which of the Australians are prepared to fight ... the "when the tough get going" scenario. In this regard, Michael Clarke has shown his class before and did so again and the spine shown by others such as Peter Siddle was not a surprise. It was the younger men who, although they didn't do enough to even compete with India, showed they could learn and bite at Dhoni's men's heals when ever they could make the chance happen. Guys like Ed Cowan, who has the skills and Steve Smith, who hasn't, showed the guts you would want in your Test team. Pattinson and Nathan Lyon fought back after being plastered early in the series.

Despite one off fifties, Matt Wade, Phil Hughes were dreadfully out gunned against India's spin. Shane Watson, like Wade and Hughes averaging less than Xavier Doherty, was spun dry, but it was spin of another kind that must have come perilously close to removing Watson's name from Ashes calculations. Ultimately, his self-imposed exile from the leadership group may have been the only thing that got him on the plane to England. Not wanting team morale to descend further during three months in England by dropping the vice captain, the selectors may have chosen an easier path by not picking him for the tour. There is a sense in which a shoulder tap may have played a role.

Chris Rogers - 5000 runs
in England
England will be a place where so many of the batsmen will feel more
comfortable, with most of them having extensive experience in the conditions there. Mark Taylor's comments at the launch about the lure of the IPL, were not as pungent as his comment that Australia have four opening batsmen heading their batting list and none of them excelling. Chris Rogers' selection makes it five but his is the cleverest selection of all. Forget the plethora of runs he has in Sheffield Shield matches in the last few years for they haven't weighed as heavy as the more than 5000 he has scored in the County Championship for Middlesex and others. Whilst one can applaud the thinking behind this decision, its a harsh one on Alex Doolan. Room should have been found on the plane for him.

Clarke must rationalise his batting line up. If players can be dropped for off field misdemeanours  then its time to be serious about form. Cowan must stay for the series but Warner given two Tests to show something. Hughes shouldn't be going to England but as he has done all career, he made saving runs at the end in India and will bat at three. He gets the same two Test contract as Warner. Watson should be dropped. He's made more promises than a tart at 16. As good as he looks, he hasn't delivered for a long time.

Here in lies the conundrum for there is no "natural" number four in this team, which means Clarke, preferring to bat at five, will have to bat at four. Usman Khawaja, who should be batting at three in Hughes spot, will need to bat at five and Wade at six. The happiest man in Australian cricket, Brad Haddin would then round out the order at seven.

Clearly, when you pick five opening batsmen, you'll have a problem in the middle order.

Siddle the ultimate scrapper
Siddle and Pattinson pick themselves but the other two are not so certain. Ryan Harris finished the year strongly for Queensland but has again fallen foul of injury in the IPL and has returned home, in order to still be fit for England. Jackson Bird and Mitchell Starc will probably fight over the other seamer's spot but if Clarke wants more depth, then the all round skills of James Faulkner would feature strongly.

Its hard to imagine Australia would want to play without a spinner, giving Lyon five Tests but in conditions favouring them, an all pace attack may be the better option.

In all events, Clarke has more depth and better options with his bowlers than he does with his batsmen.

Weighing up the relative strengths, its hard to imagine this side beating England more than once in the seven weeks of the English Test summer but at least Clarke has the right man beside him now to share the load and push his chest out at the Englishman. Haddin is a fighter in the best tradition of the Aussie underdog and his re-inclusion is a reward for diligence, hard work and honesty: all traits his team mates need modelled right now.

Now we wait for three months for the other crap to be played out and the real cricket to begin.

4 comments:

  1. One of the most frustrating aspects of the squad is that we know both Watson and Hughes will play; making it impossible for both Khawaja and Rogers to play in the same side. Warner could do with a reminder that his place isn't a given so I agree he has 2 tests to make a score but if Cowan gets 4 starts and doesn't convert I think the same should apply to him.

    I don't think selectors will be as patient with Watson now so if he fails in the first two they'll drop him and he may find it hard to get back in. Doolan is very unlucky not to be in the squad but he can blame Hughes for this fact. I like the selection of Faulkner but it's hard to see him in the 11 if Watson is playing (and bowling). Harris should be fit by the first test so selectors are spoiled for choice re quicks. Harris and Pattinson, Siddle/Bird/Faulkner/Cummins/Starc.......... surely good enough to snag one test at least if Clarke tons up!

    ReplyDelete
  2. No Cummins in either of the England-bound squads, unless I've missed something. Cowans doesn't inspire as a shot maker but he got better with every innings in India. Only Clarke was a better batsman for the Aussies over the series. Watson has done more than enough to be on the boundary in Nottingham.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Sorry, you're right about Cummins; what's happening with him? I guess I just assumed he'd be fit for the Ashes.
    I've probably been a tad unfair on Cowan. I like a stodgy opener prepared to spend time at the crease so he should get more leeway than others. The selectors have such an issue with so many openers that at least two guys will be batting out of position. Batting 4,5 or 6 has fewer implications for your approach to your innings compared with opening vs 3 and lower. If Rogers plays I hope he opens but I can't see Cowan, Watson, Warner, Hughes and Rogers all in the same 11. If Haddin is to bat 6 then someone misses out. Maybe selectors aren't planning on playing Watson?

    ReplyDelete
  4. Since they insist on playing Hughes ... and IF they did what they should and dropped Watson before the First Test, then Clarke or Khawaja at four and the other at five, Wade at six and then Haddin and the bolwers. However, I think that's unlikely. Watson will bat at four.

    Khawaja only plays when Watson is dropped.

    Rogers will take Warner's spot for the third Test if we are 0-2 and Warner has done little. Likewise, he'll take Hughes spot at three under the same circumstances.

    Hard way to start a series with three of your current top four (Warner, Hughes and Watson) under various degrees of pressure to keep their spot.

    Should they all fail, Ian Chappell comes back.

    ReplyDelete

Comments will appear after moderation.